Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Export Platform FDI as a Concept for Growth - Selected Global Experiences

EBER_Vol01_No01_Cover

Abstract

Objective: The main idea presented in the paper is based on the research devoted to interrelations between foreign direct investments (FDI) and export activities that result in the development of the specific form of foreign direct investment – Export Platform (EPFDI).

Research Design & Methods: The paper is based on literature review. The main body of the paper constitutes the geographical review and the listing of the determinants that influence the decision to launch an EPFDI.

Findings: The research brings the working hypothesis that the role of the EPFDI is increasing and free trade zone is a determinant for EPFDI creation.

Implications & Recommendations: As exports are a GDP component, the issue of export platforms is important from macroeconomic and microeconomic perspective, for politicians and entrepreneurs respectively. The existing literature about EPFDI is limited and calls for growth.

Contribution & Value Added: The paper constitutes the first review of the EPFDI from a Polish perspective.

Keywords

exporting, export platform, FDI, EPFDI, cluster, free trade zone, free trade area

PDF

Author Biography

Mariusz Omelańczuk

PhD student in Management and Economics at Warsaw School of Economics (Warsaw, Poland). Master in International Economic Relations (Warsaw School of Economics). The master thesis was devoted to barriers in foreign trade. The research areas of interest include: exports, export business development strategy, internationalisation, export determinants
related to financial market.


References

  1. Barry, F 2004, ‘Export‐platform Foreign Direct Investment: The Irish Experience’, EIB Papers, vol. 9, pp. 8‐37.
  2. Bernaciak, M, Šćepanović, V 2010, ‘Challenges of Upgrading: The Dynamics of East Central Europe's Integration into the European Automotive Production Networks’, The German Journal of Industrial Relations, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 123‐146.
  3. Chang, Y, Gayle, P 2009, ‘Exports versus FDI: do firms use FDI as a mechanism to smooth demand volatility?’, Review of World Economics, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 447‐467.
  4. Chilimoniuk‐Przeździecka, E 2011, ‘Eksport usług biznesowych z Polski’, Gospodarka Międzynarodowa – Wyzwania i Nowe Trendy, vol. 179, pp. 45‐56.
  5. Dietz, J 1985, ‘Export‐Enclave Economies, International Corporations, and Development’, Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 513‐522.
  6. Ekholm, K, Forslid, R, Markusen, J 2003, Export‐Platform Foreign Direct Investment, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.
  7. Filatotchev, I, Dyomina, N, Wright, M, Buck, T 2001, ‘Effects of Post‐Privatization Governance and Strategies on Export Intensity in the Former Soviet Union’, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 853‐871.
  8. Geishecker, I, Ulff‐Moller, J, Pawlik, K 2008, How Important is Export‐Platform FDI? Evidence from Multinational Activities in Poland, Working Paper 08‐28, University of Aarhus.
  9. Grosse, R, Trevino, R 2005, ‘New Institutional Economics and FDI Location in Central and Eastern Europe’, Management International Review, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 123‐145.
  10. Hardy, J 2007, ‘The New Competition and the New Economy: Poland in the International Division of Labour’, Europe‐Asia Studies, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 761‐777.
  11. Helpman, E, Krugman, P 1985, Market Structure and Foreign Trade, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  12. Ito, T 2012, Export Platform Foreign Direct Investment: Theory and Evidence, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan.
  13. Karaszewski, W, Jaworek, M, Kuzel, M, Szałucka, M, Szóstek, A, Długołęcka, K 2009, Foreign Direct Investment of Polish Companies: its scale, structure, determinants, influence on the competitiveness, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń.
  14. Kaufmann, D, Kraay, A, Zoido‐Lobaton, P 1999, Aggregating Governance Indicators, Policy Research Working Paper No. 2195, World Bank.
  15. Majeed, M, Ahmad, E 2008, ‘FDI and Exports in Developing Countries: Theory and Evidence’, The Pakistan Development Review, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 735‐750.
  16. Markusen, J 1990, First Mover Advantage, Blockaded Entry, and the Economics of Uneven Development, Working Paper No. 3284, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  17. Motta, M, Norman, G 1996, ‘Does Economic Integration Cause Foreign Direct Investment?’, International Economic Review, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 757‐783.
  18. Nowara, W 2008, ‘Regionalne porozumienia integracyjne a przepływy bezpośrednich inwestycji zagranicznych’, Zeszyty Naukowe, vol. 109, pp. 69‐90.
  19. Sprinz, D & Wolinsky‐Nahmias, Y (eds) 2004, Models, numbers, and cases: methods for studying international relations, The University of Michigan Press, United States of America.
  20. Tadesse, B, Ryan, M 2005, ‘Export Platforms and the Industry‐Specific FDI‐Trade Relationship’, Journal of Economic Integration, pp. 644‐671.
  21. Tomohara, A, Yokota, K 2009, ‘Export‐led Growth via Export Platform Strategies. The impact of free trade agreements on the structure of FDI’, World Economics, vol. 10, no. 4.
  22. Ugur, A, Ruane, F 2006, ‘Export Platform FDI and dualistic development’, Transnational Corporations, vol. 15, no. 1, pp.76‐113.
  23. Wawrzyniak, D 2010, ‘Determinanty lokalizacji bezpośrednich inwestycji zagranicznych’, Gospodarka Narodowa, vol. 4, pp. 89‐111.
  24. Zhilin, Y, Xuehua, W, Chenting S 2006, ‘A review of research methodologies in international business’, International Business Review, no. 15, pp. 601‐617.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.